īozbuga M, Öztürk A, Arı Z, Sahinoglu K, Bayraktar B, Polat G, Gürel I (1998) Surgical anatomy of the temporal bone and measurements of the skull base for transpetrosal approaches. īonaldi LV, do Lago A, Crema LC, Fukuda Y, Smith RL, (2004) Internal auditory canal: pre- and postnatal growth. īerlis A, Putz R, Schumacher M (1992) Direct and CT measurements of canals and foramina of the skull base. Īmjad AH, Scheer AA, Rosenthal J (1969) Human internal auditory canal. The ethnicity might contribute to morphology of the PAI and it can be explain the similar forms and distances between the various ethnic populations.Īkdag UB, Ogut E, Barut C (2020) Intraforaminal dural septations of the jugular foramen: a cadaveric study. The findings of the present study provided a detailed understanding of the preoperative and intraoperative identification of different morphologies of PAI and ethnicity. There was a similarity between the Indian and Turkish dry temporal bones in terms of distance from the PAI to the SSPS (7–8 mm) and SSS (19–20 mm) ( p = 0.01) and prevalence of morphology of PAI (oval and elliptical) ( p = 0.04, p < 0.05). On both sides, round PAI were identified more frequently than elliptical ones (32 26.6% (left) 39 32.5% (right)) ( p < 0.05). Resultsįorty-three (35.8%) elliptical (or transverse) and 77 (64.1%) oval (or round) PAI were detected in the Turkish dry temporal bones. Their horizontal diameter (HD), vertical diameter (VD), shape, prevalence of the shapes of PAI, and the distance from the sulcus for the sigmoid sinus (SSS), sulcus for superior petrosal sinus (SSPS), and jugular foramen (JF) of dry Turkish temporal bones were recorded. One hundred twenty dry adult human temporal bones (61 male, 59 female) were investigated in the study. Therefore, we performed this study to elucidate further the relationship between the different morphologies of PAI and ethnicity and to discuss their effects on surgery. Symantec Endpoint Protection 14 is available globally now.The influences of porus acusticus internus (PAI) on ethnicity and differences between populations have not been investigated so far. Integration of Symantec Endpoint Protection and Blue Coat Secure Web Gateway.Integration with Symantec Advanced Threat Protection solution.Access to Symantec’s intelligent threat cloud technology.Integration with existing infrastructure through published APIs enabling management of thousands of endpoints in multiple locations and across diverse operating systems and platforms.Other product details outlined in the release include: “Symantec Endpoint Protection 14 is a major leap forward in endpoint protection, delivering the latest innovations in endpoint security on a single platform and from a security company you can trust,” said Mike Fey, president and chief operating officer at Symantec. Symantec now protects 175 million consumer and enterprise endpoints, 163 million email users, 80 million web proxy users, and processes nearly eight billion security requests across these products every day, according to the release.
The company also says that the updated solution is capable of 99.9 percent efficacy, low false positives and a 70 percent reduced footprint over the previous generation. Symantec has announced Symantec Endpoint Protection 14, the newest iteration of the security company’s longstanding endpoint security solution.Īnnounced on November first, Endpoint Protection is powered by AI and machine learning on the endpoint and in the cloud, made possible by integrating the security telemetry of Symantec’s recent acquisition, Blue Coat.